Showing posts with label Venezuela. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Venezuela. Show all posts

Friday, September 30, 2016

And now malaria...




I am a retired child protection social worker and a seventy year old New York taxi driver. I have a degree in Political Science from The College of Staten Island (Formerly know as Richmond College, City University of New York.)

I served in the United States Army from 1967 - 1969.

I live in Harlem and am married to a Venezuelan woman. I've visited Venezuela twice, most recently from November 2014 to February 2015 staying in the homes of a truck driver, a shoe store sales clerk, a taxi driver, and a construction laborer. I traveled by car from Caracas to Michelena on the Colombian frontier.

I feel qualified and driven to speak up for a change in the policies of the United States and Venezuela.

I follow publications and articles reflecting all points of view regarding Venezuela and I'm in contact with my wife's family who are having a difficult time in Venezuela. I am concerned about them and millions like them. It's now becoming apparent that malaria, a tropical scourge is making a comeback in Venezuela is which once had been a leading country in the eradication of this dread disease.

If I stole ten thousand dollars from you and then lent you a thousand dollars how much would you owe me? If your children were so hungry they couldn't do their school work what would you do first, pay your debt to me or buy food for your kids? Most sensible people would say that you owed me nothing, and that in any case feeding your children should be your top priority.

Venezuela is mentioned 241,000 times in the Panama Papers. While not every mention necessarily points to corruption it does indicate widespread capital flight, the very thing Venezuelan foreign exchange policy was said to be intended to prevent. 


Venezuela imports over seventy percent of the food and other items it consumes, making purchases with American dollars, and the government is the source of ninety-six percent of those dollars. Imports are expected to be valued at $15 billions this year, one fourth the level of imports in 2012. 

To understand how hundreds of billions of dollars were embezzled and removed from the Venezuelan economy one has to understand the country's foreign exchange system. The national currency is ironically called the bolivar fuerte, (strong bolivar). What a bolivar is worth in dollars "all depends." The government has virtually all of the dollars there are in Venezuela because the national petroleum company (PDVSA) is responsible for 96 percent of Venezuela's exports. The government sells those dollars at different prices in bolivars according to the purpose the dollars are supposedly being used for. Currently most dollars are sold for ten bolivars each. These dollars are supposed to be used to import food staples, medical supplies and inputs for domestic agricultural and industrial production, all to be sold at cheap "fair prices." A lesser used rate that supposedly floats and is restricted is around 645 bolivars. Recently the black market price of a dollar in bolivars is reported to be around 1,025 bolivars to the dollar. 


The inflation, the shortages and the spiralling violence that is being spurred on by hunger may or may not reach the level of a "humanitarian crisis" yet but they are on the path to just that.  The unfolding malaria epidemic portends catastrophe in a country whose public health system is collapsing. and malnutrition stalks the land. Something must be done. 

As much as the dramatic fall in oil prices is blamed for Venezuela's crisis the shortages began in 2013 when oil was still worth $100 a barrel. This was the year that President Hugo Chavez died and Nicolas Maduro succeeded him. 2012 was Venezuela's most prosperous year. Imports of all goods was at $60 billion. The embezzled money, at its lowest estimate is the equivalent of over four years of imports in a country that imports 70 percent of what it consumes. This clearly would've contributed greatly to the crisis. Amnesty International says "Unless those in power do a drastic U turn in the way they are handling this dramatic crisis, what is already an extremely serious situation will turn into an unthinkable nightmare."  This statement was made before the threat of malaria arose. "Those in power" now includes not only the government, but the political opposition and major stakeholders like the United States and China. If the government of Venezuela wants to continue denying that the situation is a crisis and refuses to request assistance this simply must be gotten around. Lethal ovitraps can be used to kill the mosquito that carries not only malaria but also dengue fever, yellow fever, chikunguya and a new threat, mayaro fever.

Venezuela owes billions of dollars to American citizens and to China. Venezuela still is a major exporter of oil and an estimated 100,000 Chinese expatriates live in Venezuela.President Obama ought to revoke his official claim that Venezuela constitutes a threat to American security. This incredible claim helps to isolate Venezuela in financial markets. It also lends credence to allegations that The United States is hostile to Venezuela and is waging an economic war against Venezuela. The U.S. should also "out" Venezuelan money that is sheltered in the United States. Much of this money is ill gotten and there is a proposal that this money should be taxed by the Venezuelan government. 
The United States could and should offer unconditional emergency shipment of medicines and staple foods. Concern that such aid will be misused is legitimate but right now a neighboring country of thirty million people is facing an imminent humanitarian crisis. If initial shipments are abused the aid can be discontinued. At the least insecticides, lethal ovitraps and mosquito netting could be sent through private channels without the government needing to acknowledge the aid.

Both China and the United States should do whatever possible to avert an "unthinkable nightmare."

Friday, June 24, 2016

According to The Nation magazine Venezuela is "fucked" but not in the grip of a humanitarian crisis.

I'm glad that yesterday the Organization of American States rejected Venezuelan opposition lobbying for expulsion and sanctions against their own country. I felt that a vote against Venezuela under the rubric of the "Democratic Charter" could lead to actual military intervention, something that would not help Venezuela or its people.

Jeff Bezos, billionaire owner of The Washington Post and Hillary Clinton inner circle member and Alvaro Uribe recently hardliner right-wing president of Colombia have pushed for just this and oppositionist money grubber president of Venezuela's National Assembly Henry Ramos Allup has lobbied the United States Senate's Cuban Caucus as well.

Everyone who follows the news knows that Venezuela is in a serious crisis of shortages of food, medicine, medical equipment and thing necessary to keep the economy going like truck and bus tires, batteries and spare parts. It's easy to sympathize with calls for international humanitarian aid. Looking at history, for example recent events in Haiti which has been under foreign "humanitarian" occupation it's not difficult to understand the government’s reluctance to allow a humanitarian airlift of necessities into Venezuela.  The question of who would control the distribution of this aid isn't usually mentioned but today I saw

Bernardo Álvarez Herrera, a
mbassador, Permanent Representative of Venezuela to the OAS state on  television that Venezuela would accept "unconditional aid and is negotiating receiving aid front Trinidad and Jamaica.

Venezuelan's family and friends say that packages going to specific Venezuelans are being blocked by Venezuela’s Customs officials.

Churches and the Venezuelan community in Florida, which is predominantly anti government, are trying to get aid packages to Venezuelans.


It's understandable then, that opponents of intervention wish to combat what they see as exaggeration of the crisis. 

They (myself included) don't want to hear "we destroyed Venezuela in order to save it." A large section of the American people would enjoy a TV show featuring bombs destroying neighborhoods in order to assure the people there are getting enough to eat. This would be offset by images of US Marines giving out chewing gum and lollipops. Also, they (and myself) don't want to see the government’s credibility and authority undermined in favor of Venezuela's old regime opposition which offers no solutions of its own to the crisis and already lied to Venezuela’s increasingly desperate people last December, when they promised that if they win majority control of the National Assembly the crisis would be eased in six months. The opposition is fragmented and distrusted, while the government is widely disliked probably riven with hidden factions  and distrusted.


And so US progressive and anti interventionist Gabriel Hetland took to the pages of The Nation magazine


Hetland sings a simple (and merry) song about a government official who's getting excellent care of a sprained hand in a government clinic. He claims that the clinics are working normally. I was in Venezuela from November 2014 until February 2015.
Let me tell you a story about something that is happening now in a government hospital on a city I won't name in Venezuela.  Theres a father to be running around from one place to another getting a supper together for a mother to be who's been hospitalized. For months she's not been gaining weight though pregnant. She even started to lose weight.  She got a check up and was found to be anemic.  Her aunt who lives in New York City came to bring vitamin and mineral supplements for her, a pregnant neighbor and several relatives, children, who were not thriving.

Yesterday she started bleeding badly. Her spouse got her to the nearest free public hospital, as they have not much money or insurance.

The hospital doesn't feed the patients. The future father had to buy hypodermic needles and other equipment at a nearby pharmacy. He brought her a scant meal of coffee and an arepa with black beans. The nurses demanded he go back out to fetch something for them, they being hungry. So far it looks like mother and six month fetus are going to make it. He'll be coming three times a day to bring what food he finds to share with the mother to be and the nurses.






Saturday, February 13, 2016

The US is at war with Venezuela

Why do I say this? Well, for one thing  Obama did officially declare Venezuela a "national security threat to the United States.

Obama  "walked it back"
unofficially and as a result of the public relations mistake the Declaration turned out to be. However, the proclamation has not been officially revoked. Venezuela built UNASUR, as opposed to the United States dominated Organization of American States. Venezuela defied sanctions against Iran. It invited Russian forces to visit. It replaced the United States as its main trading partner with China. Venezuelan diplomatic efforts resuscitated the Organization of Petroleum Exporting States.
Venezuela broke relations with Israel. It refused to accept the credentials of a United States Ambassador.

President Obama nominated Larry Palmer to be ambassador in Caracas.

Mr. Palmer answered questions about Venezuela by Sen. Lugar (R) saying that morale was low in the Venezuelan armed forces, and that Colombian reports of FARC bases in Venezuela are credible and should be investigated. 

In response, President Hugo Chavez refused to accept Palmer as U.S. ambassador.

This is an impressive list of Venezuela's "impudent" acts against US world dominance.  It would be naive to assume that these actions would go unpunished. 

              
Venezuela rejected the assignment of Larry Palmer as United States Ambassador.



Venezuela is now going through a series of epidemiological problems with mosquito borne zika, malaria, dengue and chickenguya cases compounding Shortages of medications, medical equipment, high protein foods, and physicians. (There is reason to believe that zika is also a sexually transmitted disease - a serious threat in a country where condoms are difficult to find and priced beyond the means of most people.) The government is loath to use the words "medical (or humanitarian) emergency" fearing that this could be a prelude to a style Haiti "humanitarian intervention."

This 2013 video could have been made yesterday. Haiti after a "humanitarian intervention."

Now That the  United States backed and funded  opposition dominates the country's legislative branch it is pushing for a declaration of a humanitarian crises in Venezuela. 

The United States has a history of waging unconventional warfare Against Civilian Populations.
Socialist Cuba is Mobilized Against insect borne diseases. 



United States Drug Enforcement Agency and Special Forces are based in Colombia, while Hugo Chavez expelled United States Drug Enforcement agents for interference in its internal affairs.











Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Venezuelan Politician Urges International Assistance in Medical Emergency


Of course Nicmer Evans is talking about the fact that Venezuela is suffering shortages of medications (not to mention medical equipment ) that is causing poor health and unnecessary deaths. Evans is leader of a small political party called "Socialist Tide. " This party's history is inside the Chavez movement but it is not presently part of either the Socialist Party coalition nor the opposition "Democratic Roundtable" which won a resounding victory in elections for the country’s Parliament on December 5 and took charge on January 5.
The country's economy is in very bad shape with shortages of staple foods and personal necessities. Inflation over 2015 was over 100%. The International Monetary Fund has forecast that the economy may shrink by 10% this year with a possible rate of inflation of 700%. The country's main export is petroleum. Prices for petroleum shrank from $145 a barrel in 2013 to around $27 a barrel now.
The past month shows. that neither the Government nor the opposition that dominates the parliament are confronting the urgency of the situation in Mr. Evans' opinion.  No doubt that by asking for foreign help with the medical humanitarian crisis he is hoping to focus the attention of the government and the parliament on the urgent conditions that Venezuelans now face.


Saturday, January 23, 2016

Narco States

Western banks reap big money handling the filthy lucre generated by the International trade in cocaine,  marijuana, and heroin. 

Recently, there has been lots of noise, a couple of arrests, and leaked threats of US prosecutions against Venezuela and prominent Venezuelans. I bring this up (again) not to assert that any particular person who has been or will be accused is innocent (or not). I am concerned that the United States government may very well inflict  broad sanctions  on Venezuela or even invade Venezuela on a drug war pretext. Venezuela is now going through a very difficult time. It owes a great deal of money to the international one percent, much of it coming due soon, and it may be unable to make the payments on time. On top of that an issue of a major multi billion dollar embezzlement is emerging and this may prove out that a substantial part of that debt is illegitimate and ought not be paid. 
It ought to fall to Venezuela and its people to work through these problems. 

Recently Henry Ramos Allup, incorrectly christened a democrat, has risen to a place of  political power  as President of Venezuela’s National Assembly along with a coalition of political parties who oppose the president of the country, Nicolas Maduro. 


My point is that Ramos Allup is interested in pleasing the political officers in the US Embassy in Caracas.  He would be capable of declaring himself Venezuela's president and requesting US military intervention. 
I've added information that I hope exposes the hypocrisy of any US "concern" about real or imagined drug trafficking by Venezuelans.








US Marijuana Legalization Gives International Law The Middle Finger . In fact, even before the marijuana legalization craze began marijuana was the number one cash crop in the United States. 

http://www.drugscience.org/Archive/bcr2/cashcrops.html

At an estimated $35.8 billion marijuana is by far the largest cash crop in the United States when compared to the average production values of other crops from 2003 to 2005. (Production values for other crops were obtained from the Department of Agriculture. [22])
Table 7. Top Cash Crops in the United States (Average Value 2003 – 2005)
Average
Rank
Crop
Production
Value ($1000s)
1
Marijuana
$35,803,591
2
Corn
$23,299,601
3
Soybeans
$17,312,200
4
Hay
$12,236,638
5
Vegetables
$11,080,733
6
Wheat
$7,450,907
7
Cotton
$5,314,870
8
Grapes
$2,876,547
9
Apples
$1,787,532
10
Rice
$1,706,665
11
Oranges
$1,583,009
12
Tobacco
$1,466,633
13
Sugarbeets
$1,158,078
14
Sugarcane
$942,176
15
Sorghum
$840,923
16
Cottonseed
$821,655
17
Peanuts
$819,617
18
Barley
$653,095
19
Peaches
$474,745
20
Beans
$467,236
Based on a comparison


























BORDERLAND: DISPATCHES FROM THE U.S.-MEXICO BOUNDARY

Awash In Cash, Drug Cartels Rely On Big Banks To Launder Profits

A woman uses a cash machine at an HSBC bank office in Mexico City. The multi-national bank was heavily penalized several years ago for permitting huge transfers of drug cartel money between Mexico and the U.S.
A woman uses a cash machine at an HSBC bank office in Mexico City. The multi-national bank was heavily penalized several years ago for permitting huge transfers of drug cartel money between Mexico and the U.S.
Enric Marti/AP
The Sinaloa Cartel, headquartered on Mexico's northern Pacific Coast, is constantly exploring new ways to launder its gargantuan profits. The State Departmentreports that Mexican trafficking organizations earn between $19 and $29 billion every year from selling marijuana, cocaine, heroin and methamphetamines on the streets of American cities.
And Sinaloa is reportedly the richest, most powerful of them all, according to the Drug Enforcement Administration. The capture last month of the Mexican druglord Joaquin "Chapo" Guzman has cast a spotlight on the smuggling empire he built.
One key to the Sinaloa Cartel's success has been to use the global banking system to launder all this cash.
"It's very important for them to get that money into the banking system and do so with as little scrutiny as possible," says Jim Hayes, special agent in charge of Homeland Security Investigations for the New York office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE. He was lead agent in the 2012 case that revealed how Sinaloa money men used HSBC, one of the world's largest banks, as their private vault.
ICE says in 2007 and 2008, the Sinaloa Cartel and a Colombian cartel wire-transferred $881 million in illegal drug proceeds into U.S. accounts.
Huge Daily Deposits
According to a subsequent investigation by the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, cartel operatives would sometimes deposit hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash in a single day using boxes designed to fit the exact dimensions of the teller's window at HSBC branches in Mexico.






















America’s Marijuana Laws Give International Law the Middle Finger


Martin Bernetti/Getty Images
The United States is in the midst of amarijuana legalization revolution. Four states and the nation’s capital city have opened up the once-feared black markets and made marijuana available for legal purchase by most of the adult population. There is still one big glaring issue, however: a very large, international governing organization that could try to pull the plug on the entire thing.
Surprisingly, it’s not the DEA, FBI, or White House. Although marijuana isstill a Schedule I drug under federal law (and federal law generally trumps state law), the DoJ issued a memorandum in 2013 that effectively made a deal with states. As long as they “establish strict regulatory schemes that protect the eight federal interests identified in the Department’s guidance,” then the federal government will defer “its right to challenge their legalization laws at this time.”
It’s the United Nations that could rain on the legal-weed parade. The “look the other way mentality” offered by the DoJ is not in line with international drug laws, and some people at the U.N. have decided to throw around their weight a little bit.
“I don’t see how (the new laws) can be compatible with existing conventions,” Yury Fedotov, executive director of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), told reporters late last year,per Reuters. The convention Fedotov is talking about is the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, which, among other things, attempts to relegate marijuana to strictly medical or scientific use. UNODC monitors compliance with the convention.
But if you’re like most Americans, then you are probably not too worried about how the U.N. feels about marijuana legalization in the United States. According to Gallup, 58% of Americans now support legalization. Besides, despite a fairly strong image, many Americans feel like the U.S. is outside of the reach of the U.N. on mostly domestic issues like drug policy. There’s even precedent for a U.N. member nation bucking the convention, as Uruguay legalized cannabis in 2013.
So, what does it really mean if the U.S. is technically violating international drug law? Does it mean anything at all, and should anyone actually care?
What it mainly comes down to, as it does internally within the United States, is a simple look at the costs and benefits. There really isn’t anything that the U.N. can do to stop states within the U.S. from legalizing marijuana, and there really isn’t any reason why the U.N. would want to spend resources policing it. It’s just like how the federal government under the Obama administration has opted to allow states to self-police and implement their own legal markets, instead of expending the likely billions it would take to enforce the current Schedule I classification of cannabis.
This is truly the biggest point in the whole argument. From an economic standpoint, it doesn’t make a lot of sense for the DEA, DoJ, or U.N. to spend time, money, and manpower to fight back against something that doesn’t provide much benefit. Not only that, but the political toll that the U.N. would likely have to suffer as a result would probably be extremely high if the body chose to engage in sanctions or some other kind of punitive measure.
If there’s one thing that truly gets Americans hot, it’s anyone — especially an international organization like the U.N. — messing with their sense of personal freedom, or putting at risk their opportunity for economic prosperity.
The U.N. seems concerned that the U.S. will, in the near future, give full legalization a blessing from the federal government — it appears not to want that sentiment to spread internationally. Within the United States, however, that sentiment has already taken root and is spreading. The 2016 election cycle should only go to further the pro-legalization crowd’s agenda, and sooner or later the U.S. government will need to address the international community’s concerns.
Follow Sam on Twitter @Sliceofginger

More from Business